WWW.ALITTLELAB.COM |
|
Publications On this page you will find a list of published works involving members of our group By participating in our studies you are contributing to this list! You can look at full reprints using Adobe PDF reader by clicking on the links below. By clicking on the link you are considered to be requesting a copy for your personal use. You can download Adobe reader HERE. Articles: In Press Little AC, Paukner A, Woodward RA, & Suomi SJ. (2012). Facial asymmetry is negatively related to health in macaque monkeys. . Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. PDF Parr LA, Taubert J, Little AC, & Hancock PJB. (2012). The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. PDF 2012 133. Little AC. (2012). Manipulation of infant-like traits affects perceived cuteness of infant, adult, and cat faces. Ethology 118, 775-782. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02068.x PDF 132. Kuppens T, Pollet TV, Teixeira CP, Demoulin S, Roberts SC, & Little AC. (2012). Emotions in context: Anger causes ethnic bias but not gender bias in men but not women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 432-441 DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1848 . 131. Little AC, Hancock PJB, DeBruine LM, & Jones BC. (2012). Adaptation to anti-faces and the perception of correct identity in an average face. Frontiers in Perception Science, 3:19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00019. 130. Little AC & Jones BC. (2012). Variation in facial masculinity and symmetry preferences across the menstrual cycle is moderated by relationship context. Psychoneuroendrocrinology 37, 999-1008. PDF 129. Roberts SC, Klapilová K, Little AC, Burriss, RP, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Petrie M, & Havlicek J. (2012). Relationship satisfaction and outcome in women who meet their partner while using oral contraception. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. PDF 128. Quist M, DeBruine LM, Little AC & Jones BC. (2012). Integrating social knowledge and physical cues when judging the attractiveness of potential mates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 770-773. 127. Watkins CD, Jones BC, Little AC, DeBruine LM & Feinberg DR. (2012). Cues to the sex ratio of the local population influence women’s preferences for facial symmetry. Animal Behaviour, 83, 545-553. 126. Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC & O'Connor JJM. (2012). Women’s self-perceptions of health and attractiveness predict vocal masculinity preferences in different directions across short- and long-term contexts. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. PDF 125. Welling LLM, Puts DA, Roberts SC, Little AC, & Burriss RP. (2012). Hormonal contraceptive use and mate retention behavior in women and their male partners Hormones and Behaviour, 61, 114-120. 124. O'Connor JJM, Feinberg DR, Fraccaro PJ, Borak DJ, Tigue CC, Re DE, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Perrett DI, Tiddeman BP. (2012). Manipulations of vocal and facial masculinity in videos influence attractiveness. Ethology 118 1–10. PDF 123. DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Jones BC. (2012). Commentary: Extending parasite-stress theory to variation in human mate preferences. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 36, 26-27. Full article and commentaries PDF Original link: doi:10.1017/S0140525X1100098. 2011 122. Jones BC, Main JC, Little AC, & DeBruine LM. (2011). Further evidence that facial cues of dominance modulate gaze-cueing in human observers. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70, 193-197. 121. Jones BC, Little AC, Watkins DC, Welling LLM, & DeBruine LM. (2011). Reported sexual desire predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic cues in women's faces. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 40, 1281-1285. 120. Little AC, Caldwell CA, Jones BC, & DeBruine LM. (2011). Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments. Archives of Sexual Behaviour. PDF 119. Roberts SC, Kralevich A, Ferdenzi C, Saxton TK, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Havlicek J. (2011). Body odor quality predicts behavioral attractiveness in humans. Archives of Sexual Behaviour. PDF 118. Jones BC, Vukovic J, Little AC, DeBruine LM, & Roberts SC. (2011). Circum-menopausal changes in women’s preferences for sexually dimorphic shape cues in peer-aged faces. Biological Psychology, 87, 453-455. PDF 117. Saxton TK, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC, & Roberts SC. (2011). A longitudinal study of adolescents’ judgments of the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 43-55. DOI: 10.1556/JEP.9.2011.22.1 PDF 116. Little AC, McPherson J, Dennington L, & Jones BC. (2011). Accuracy in assessment of self-reported stress and a measure of health from static facial information. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 693-698. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.010 PDF 115. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Watkins CD, Roberts SC, Little AC, Smith FG, & Quist M. (2011). Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 108, 11710-11714. PDF 114. Little AC, Connely J, Feinberg DR, Roberts SC, & Jones BC. (2011). Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behavioural Ecology, 22, 862-868. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arr061 PDF 113. Hancock PJB & Little AC. Adaptation may cause some of the face caricature effect. Perception, 40, 317-322. PDF 112. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Watkins CD, & Feinberg DR. (2011).'Eavesdropping' and perceived male dominance rank in humans. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1203-1208. PDF 111. Little AC, DeBruine LM, & Jones BC. (2011). Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278, 2032-2039. PDF 110. Little AC, Jones BC, & DeBruine LM. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366, 1571, 1638-1659. PDF 109. Little AC, Jones BC, & DeBruine LM. (2011). The many faces of research on face perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366, 1571, 1634-1637. PDF 108. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC, Crawford JR, &Welling LM. (2011). Further evidence for regional variation in women's masculinity preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278, 813-814. PDF 107. Burriss RP, Roberts SC, Welling LLM, Puts DA, & Little AC. (2011). Heterosexual romantic couples mate assortatively for facial symmetry, but not masculinity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 601-613. PDF 106. Vukovic J, Jones BC, Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, G FG, Welling LLM, & Little AC. Variation in perceptions of physical dominance and trustworthiness predicts individual differences in the effect of relationship context on women's preferences for masculine pitch in men's voices. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 37-48. PDF 105. Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Caldwell CA. (2011). Social learning and human mate preferences: a likely mechanism for reinforcing universals and driving cultural variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Evolution and human behavioural diversity 366, 366-375. Eds: Gillian R. Brown, Thomas E. Dickins, Rebecca Sear and Kevin N. Laland. PDF 104. Little AC, DeBruine LM, & Jones BC. (2011). Category-contingent face adaptation for novel colour categories: contingent effects are seen only after social or meaningful labelling. Cognition, 118, 116-122. Corrected PDF 2010 103. Glassenberg AN, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, & DeBruine LM. (2010). Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 39, 1289-1296. PDF 102. Fraccaro PJ, Feinberg DR., DeBruine LM, Little AC, Watkins CD, & Jones BC. (2010). Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 447-461. PDF 101. Halsey LG, Huber J, Bufton RDJ, Little AC. An explanation for enhanced perceptions of attractiveness after alcohol consumption. Alcohol, 44, 307-313. PDF 100. Jones BC, Feinberg DR, Bestelmeyer PEG, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. Adaptation to different mouth shapes influences visual perception of ambiguous lip speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 522-528. PDF 99. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Crawford JR, Welling LM, & Little AC. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 2405-2410. PDF 98. Main JC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Jones BC. (2010). Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression and physical attractiveness on face preferences. Perception, 39(1) 62 – 71. PDF 97. Vukovic J, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Feinberg DR, Smith FG, Little AC, Welling LLM, & Main JC. Women’s own voice pitch predicts their preferences for masculinity in men’s voices. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 786-772. PDF 96. Little AC, Saxton TK, Roberts SC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Vukovic J, Perrett DI, Feinberg DR, & Chenore T. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age-range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendrocrinology 35, 912-920. PDF 95. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Feinberg DR, & Main J. (2010). Reading the look of love: Sexually dimorphic cues in opposite-sex faces influence gaze-categorization. Psychological Science 21, 796-798. PDF 94. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, & Little AC. (2010). Opposite effects of visual versus imagined presentation of faces on subsequent sex perception. Visual Cognition, 18, 816-828. PDF 93. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Smith FG, & Little AC. Are attractive men's faces are masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 36, 751-758. PDF 92. Campbell BC, Dreber A, Coren L. Apicella CL, Eisenberg DTA, Gray PB, Little AC, Garcia JR, Richard S. Zamore RS, & Koji Lum JK. Testosterone exposure, dopaminergic reward, and sensation-seeking in young men. Physiology and Behavior 99, 451-456. PDF 91. Bestelmeyer PEG, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Welling LLM. (2010). Face aftereffects demonstrate interdependent processing of expression and sex and of expression and race. Visual Cognition, 18, 255-274. PDF 90. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Main J, Little AC, Welling LLM, Feinberg DR, & Tiddeman BP. (2010). Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 617-624. PDF 89. Jones BC, Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Vukovic J. (2010). A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour, 79, 57-62. PDF 88. Conway CA, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. (2010). Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze. British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 109-121. PDF 2009 87. Smith FG, Jones BC, Little AC, DeBruine LM, Welling LLM, Vukovic J, & Conway CA. (2009). Hormonal contraceptive use and perceptions of trust modulate the effect of relationship context on women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 195-210. PDF 86. Main JC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others. Perception 38(9), 1275-1283. PDF 85. Welling LLM, DeBruine LM, Bestelmeyer PEG, Little AC, & Jones BC. (2009). View-contingent aftereffects suggest joint coding of face shape and view. Perception, 38, 133-141. PDF 84. Welling LLM, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Jones BC. Extraversion predicts individual differences in women’s face preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 996-998. PDF 83. Smith FG, Jones BC, Welling LLM, Little AC, Vukovic J, Main JC, & DeBruine LM. Waist-hip ratio, but not BMI, influences women’s preferences for masculine male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 476-480. PDF 82. Saxton TK, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC, & Roberts SC. Face and voice attractiveness judgments change during adolescence. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 30, 398-408. PDF 81. Saxton TK, Little AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, & Roberts SC. (2009). Adolescents’ preferences for sexual dimorphism are influenced by relative exposure to male and female faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 864-868. PDF 80. Saxton TK, Little AC, Rowland HM, Gao T, & Roberts SC. (2009). Trade-offs between markers of absolute and relative quality in human facial preferences. Behavioural Ecology, 20, 1133-1137. PDF 79. Currie TE. & Little AC. (2009). The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 30, 409-416. PDF 78. Roberts SC, Saxton TK, Murray AK, Burriss RP, Rowland HM, & Little AC. (2009). Static and dynamic facial images cue similar attractiveness judgements. Ethology, 115, 588-595. PDF 77. Smith FG, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. (2009). Interactions between masculinity-femininity and apparent health in face preferences. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 441-445. PDF 76. Vukovic J, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Feinberg DR. Circum-menopausal changes in women’s face preferences. Biology Letters, 5, 62-64. PDF 75. Roberts SC, Little AC, Lyndon A, Roberts J, & Wright RL. (2009). Increase in self-rated and other-rated confidence and attractiveness of young men associated with manipulation of body odour. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 37, 41-54. PDF 74. Gerald MS, Waitt C, & Little AC. (2009). Pregnancy coloration in macaques may act as a warning signal to reduce antagonism by conspecifics. Behavioural Processes 80, 7-11. PDF 73. Burriss RP, Rowland HM, & Little AC. Facial scarring enhances male attractiveness for short-term relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 213-217. PDF 2008
72. Welling LLM, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Smith FG. (2008). Exposure to sexually attractive men decreases women’s preferences for feminine faces. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 219-230. PDF 71. Saxton TK, Lyndon A, Little AC, & Roberts SC. (2008). Androstadienone, a putative human social chemosignal, modulates female attributions of male attractiveness in some contexts. Hormones & Behaviour, 54, 597-601. PDF 70. Welling LLM, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Smith FG, Feinberg DR, Little AC, & Al-Dujaili EAS. (2008). Attraction to feminine faced women is stronger when men’s testosterone levels are high. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 703-708. PDF 69. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. (2008). Adaptation reinforces preferences for attractive faces. Visual Cognition, 16, 849-858. PDF 68. Vukovic J, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Welling LLM, Little AC, Smith FG. (2008). Self-rated attractiveness is positively associated with women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 451-456. PDF 67. Apicella CL, Dreber A, Campbell BC, Ellison P, Gray PB, Hoffman M, & Little AC. (2008). Testosterone and Financial Risk-Taking. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 29, 384-390. PDF 66. Little AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, & Feinberg DR. 2008. Symmetry and sexual-dimorphism in human faces: interrelationships in preference suggest a common advert. Behavioural Ecology 19(4), 902-908. PDF 65. Little AC, Jones BC, & DeBruine LM. (2008). Preferences for variation in masculinity in real male faces change across the menstrual cycle. Personality and Individual Differences 45, 478–482. PDF
64. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. (2008). Preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity are correlated: evidence for multiple quality signals. Evolution and Human Behaviour 29(4), 233-241. PDF 63. Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, Tiddeman BP, Feinberg DR, Perrett DI, Apicella CL, & Marlowe FW. Symmetry correlates with sexually dimorphic traits in faces. PLoS one 3(5): e2106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002106. PDF 62. Conway CA, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Hay J, Perrett DI & Feinberg DR. (2008). Integrating physical and social cues when forming face preferences: Differences among low and high anxiety individuals. Social Neuroscience 1(3), 89-95. PDF 61. Conway CA, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Sahraie A. (2008). Transient pupil constrictions to faces are sensitive to orientation and species. Journal of Vision 8(3):17, 1-11. PDF 60. Jones BC, Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. (2008). Integrating cues of social interest and voice pitch in men¹s preferences for women¹s voices. Biology Letters 4(2), 192-194. PDF 59. Bestelmeyer PEG, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Perrett DI, A Schneider, Welling LLM, & Conway CA. (2008). Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition 107, 353-365.PDF 58. Little AC, Burriss RP, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Caldwell CA. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evolution and Human Behaviour 27, 140-146. PDF 57. DeBruine LM, Jones BC,Little AC, &Perrett DI. (2008). Social perception of facial resemblance in humans. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 37(1), 64-77. PDF 56. Jones BC , DeBruine LM, Perrett DI, Little AC, Feinberg DR, & Law Smith MJ. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 37(1), 78-84. PDF 55. Roberts SC & Little AC. (2008). Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica 132, 309–321. PDF 54. Little AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC & Waitt C. (2008). Category contingent face aftereffects for race, age, and species. Cognition 106, 1537-1547. PDF 53. Conway CA, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. (2008). Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 275, 63-54. PDF 2007 52. Apicella CL, Little AC, & Marlowe FW. (2007). Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception 36, 1813–1820.PDF 51. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Unger L, Little AC, & Feinberg DR. (2007). Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 33, 1420-1430. PDF 50. Little AC, Apicella CL, & Marlowe FW. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274, 3113-3117. PDF 49. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC, Conway CA, Welling LLM, Smith F. (2007). Sensation seeking and men's face preferences. Evolution and Human Behaviour 28, 439-446. PDF 48. Little AC & Hill R. (2007). Social perception of red suggests special role in dominance signalling. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 1-4, 161-168. PDF
47. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, & Feinberg DR. (2007). The valence of experiences with faces influences generalized preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 1-4, 119-130. PDF 46. Mehu M, Little AC, & Dunbar RIM. (2007). Duchenne smiles and the perception of generosity and sociability in faces. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 1-4, 183-196.PDF 45. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, & Little AC. (2007). The role of symmetry in attraction to average faces. Perception and Psychophysics 69 (8), 1273-1277. PDF 44. Welling LLM, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Conway CA, Law Smith MJ, Little AC, Feinberg DR, Sharp MA, Al-Dujaili EAS. (2007). Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones & Behaviour 52 (2), 156-161. PDF 43. Little AC, Jones, BC, Burt DM, & Perrett DI. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology 76, 209–216. PDF 42. Little AC,
41. Gerald MS, Waitt C, Little AC, & Kraiselburd E. (2007). Females pay attention toward female secondary sexual color: An experimental study in rhesus macaques. International Journal of Primatology 28, 1-7. PDF 40. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Burriss RP, & Feinberg DR. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences influences judgments of attractiveness in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274, 899-903. PDF 39. Little AC, Cohen D, Jones BC, & Belsky J. (2007). Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 61, 967-973. PDF 38. Burriss RP, Little AC, & Nelson E. (2007). 2D:4D ratio is related to sexually dimorphic facial characteristics and perceived dominance. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 36, 377-384. PDF 37. Little AC, Burriss RP, Jones BC, Roberts SC. (2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behaviour 28, 18-27. PDF 36. Little AC & Perrett DI. (2007). Using composite face images to assess accuracy in personality attribution. British Journal of Psychology 98, 111-126. PDF 2006 35. Penton-Voak IS, Pound N, Little AC, & Perrett DI. (2006). Accuracy in personality attributions made on the basis of facial characteristics. Social Cognition 24, 607-640. 34. Little AC &
33. Little AC & Mannion HD. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex images affects preferences for sexual dimorphism in opposite-sex faces. Animal Behaviour 72, 981-987. PDF 32. Little AC, Burt
DM, & Perrett DI. (2006).
What is good is beautiful: face preference reflects
desired personality. Personality and Individual Differences 41,
1107-1118. PDF
30. Jones
29. Buckingham G, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Welling L, Conway C, Tiddeman BP, Jones BC. (2006). Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and human Behaviour 27, 381-389. PDF 28. Waitt C, Gerald MS, Little AC, & Kraiselburd E (2006). Selective attention toward female secondary sexual color in male rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 68, 738-744. PDF 27. Burriss RP & Little AC (2006). Effects of partner conception risk phase on male perception of dominance in faces. Evolution and human Behaviour 27, 297-305. PDF 26. DeBruine LM,
25. Little AC, Burt DM,
& Perrett, DI (2006).
Assortative
mating for perceived personality in faces. Personality and Individual Differences
40, 973-984. PDF
2005 24. Little AC, DeBruine LM, &
23. Jones BC, Little AC, Boothroyd LG, DeBruine LM, Feinberg DR, Law Smith MJ, Cornwell RE, Moore FR, Perrett DI (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior 48, 283-290. PDF 22. Roberts
SC, Little AC, Gosling
M, Jones
BC, Perrett
DI, Carter V, & Petrie M.
(2005) MHC-assortative facial
preferences in humans. Proceedings
of the Royal Society of
21. Boothroyd L, Burt DM, Cornwell RE, Jones BC, Little AC, Tiddeman BP, & Perrett DI (2005). Facial masculinity is related to perceived age but not perceived health. Evolution and human Behaviour 26, 417– 431. PDF 20. Jones BC, Little AC,Boothroyd L, Feinberg DR, Cornwell RE, DeBruine LM, Roberts SC, Penton-Voak IS, Law Smith MJ, Moore FR, Davis HP, & Perrett DI (2005). Women’s physical and psychological condition independently predict their preference for apparent health in faces. Evolution and human Behaviour 26, 451– 457. PDF 19. Jones BC, Perrett DI, Little AC, Boothroyd L, Cornwell RE, Feinberg DR, Tiddeman BP, Whiten S, Pitman RW, Hillier SG, Burt DM, Stirrat MR, Law-Smith MJ, & Moore FR (2005). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272, 347–354. PDF 18. Roberts SC, Little AC, Gosling M, Petrie M, Jones BC, Perrett DI, Penton-Voak, IS (2005). MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and human Behaviour 26, 213–226. PDF 17. Feinberg,
DR, Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, & Perrett DI (2005). Manipulations
of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of
human male voices. Animal Behaviour 69, 561–568. PDF 2004 16. Jones BC, Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, & Perrett DI (2004). The relationship between symmetry and visible skin condition in male facial attractiveness. Evolution and human Behaviour 25, 24-30. PDF 15. Kovács G, Gulyás B, Savic I, Perrett DI, Cornwell RE, Little AC, Jones BC, Burt DM, Gál V, & Vidnyánszky Z (2004). Smelling human sex hormone-like compounds affects face gender judgment of men. NeuroReport 15, 1275-1277. PDF 14. Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, & Perrett DI (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception 33, 569-576. PDF 13. Roberts SC, Havlicek J, Flegr J, Hruskova, M, Little AC, Jones BC, Perrett DI, & Petrie M (2004) Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271, S270-S272 (Biology Letters). PDF 12. Cornwell
RE, Boothroyd L, Burt DM, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, Pitman R,
Whiten S, & Perrett DI (2004) Concordant preferences for opposite-sex
signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics. Proceedings
of the Royal Society of London B 271, 635–640. PDF 2003 11. Little AC & Jones BC (2003). Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270, 1759-1763. PDF 10. Penton-Voak IS, Little AC, Jones BC, Burt DM, Tiddeman BP, & Perrett DI (2003). Measures of female condition influence preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male Homo sapiens. Journal of Comparative Psychology 117, 264-271. PDF 9. Waitt C, Little AC, Wolfensohn S, Honess P, Brown AP, Buchanan-Smith HM, & Perrett DI (2003). Evidence from rhesus macaques suggests male coloration plays a role in female primate mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Suppl.) 270, S144 – S146 (Now Biology Letters). PDF 8. Little
AC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, & Perrett DI (2003). Investigating an
imprinting-like phenomenon in humans: partners and opposite-sex parents
have similar hair and eye colour. Evolution and Human Behaviour 24,
43-51.
PDF 2002 7. Little AC & Hancock, PJ (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness on the perception of attractiveness in human male faces. British Journal of Psychology 93, 451-464. PDF 6. Little AC, Jones, BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, & Perrett DI (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269, 1095-1100. PDF 5. Perrett DI, Penton-Voak IS, Little AC, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, Schmidt N, Oxley R, & Barrett L (2002). Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269, 873-880. PDF 4. Little
AC & Perrett DI (2002). Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder:
evolution and individual differences in face preference. The Psychologist
15, 28-32. PDF 2001 3. Jones BC, Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM & Perrett DI (2001). Measured facial asymmetry and perceptual judgements of attractiveness and health. Evolution and Human Behaviour 22, 417-429. PDF 2. Penton-Voak IS, Jones BC, Little AC, Baker S, Tiddeman B, Burt DM, & Perrett D I (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions, and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1617-1623. PDF 1. Little
AC, Burt DM, Penton-Voak, IS, & Perrett DI (2001). Self-perceived
attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism
and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
B, 268, 39-44.
PDF Book Chapters: 7. Griffey JAF & Little AC. 2010). Sexual selection, mate choice, and primate preferences. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Animal Behaviour: New Research. New York: Nova Science Publishers. 6. Little AC & Perrett DI. Facial Attractiveness. (2011). In R. Adams Jr, N. Ambady, K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo (Eds.), The Science of Social Vision. New York: Oxford University Press. 5. Little AC & Jones BC. The Evolutionary Cognitive Neuropsychology of Face Preferences. (2010s). In T. Shakleford and S. Platek (Eds.), Foundations in Evolutionary Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 4. Saxton TK., Little AC, & Roberts SC. (2008). Ecological Validity in the Study of Human Pheromones. In JL Hurst, R Beynon, SC Roberts and T Wyatt (Eds), Chemical Signals in Vertebrates (Vol. 11), pp 111-120. New York: Springer. 3. Jones BC, Little AC, & Perrett DI (2003). Why are symmetrical faces attractive? In S. P. Shodov (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research (Vol. 19), pp 145-166. New York: Nova Science Publishers. PDF 2. Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, & Perrett DI (2002). Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: how cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In G. Rhodes and L. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition, volume 1: Facial Attractiveness, pp 59-90. Westport, CT: Ablex. PDF 1. Little AC, Perrett DI, Penton-Voak IS, & Burt DM (2002). Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness. In A. Kenichi and T. Akazawa. (Eds.), Human Mate Choice and Prehistoric Marital Networks, pp 101-115. International research center for Japanese studies: Kyoto, Japan: Tanaka Printing Co. Ltd. PDF |
Copyright © All rights reserved. Affiliated to the University of Stirling UK. Terms of use | Privacy policy | Contact |